Right they did, and CoD didn't name them "The Opposing Force", they just called them OpFor.....oh wait

From,

Chris.

Ahahaha, mice Wall.

Amnesia scares the crap out of me, still to this day.

I would say AC : B.

They really perfected it from the last game.

~SN

So a game is mediocre because it changes the name of an enemy to avoid mass criticism? Of course, what am I thinking. That game is terrible. Now a game that comes out with a new version every year, for another 60 dollars, that takes out the good things, is filled with glitches, and adds completely retarded bullshit? Shit, sign me up for that awesome franchise!

Medal of Honor(MADE BY DICE/PUBLISHED BY EA) is not a bad game, at least not as bad as people have been making it out to be. Sure there are problems, many of them surprisingly technical, but there are truly moments (and mechanics) of brilliance at work here. This is certainly not the work of an upstart developer who is trying to simply get a piece of the shooter pie. However, the problems are also not ones which are indicative of a well seasoned development studio. They are a result of a rush to production, things which obviously could have been fixed and tightened up if the looming shadow of Call of Duty wasn’t bearing down on them like a shirtless drunk uncle with a hard on.

The bugs themselves are indefensible. Teammates not responding to cue’s which would push the mission along, getting stuck standing on a vehicle which then makes the entire world turn upside down literally, and some messy animations really tar the experience. The game also does a fairly lousy job of letting you know exactly what you should be doing at any one time. Often times I would be left standing around, trying to figure out what I should do or where I should go while my teammates are off screen shouting at me to hurry up.It’s really a shame that most of the gameplay is so mediocre because the settings themselves are fantastic, and could have really led to some incredibly diverse gameplay and mission goals. The mountainous terrain in particular is rendered so beautifully, and with such a believably organic feel, that they look downright photorealistic in their presentation. I could go on, but none the less not a bad game, but not worth a buy, maybe a gamefly or rent.

I apologize but your comment is completely fucking stupid, "CoD wouldn't take that shit"? Yes they would, and for one the people who made CoD are named Infinity Ward, Plus that group just so happened to be the United Kingdom's Defense Secretary, a game company up against a countries government, yeah they have the right to be scared, they DID try to defend there game, but they lost, so dont call Medal of Honor(DICE) pussies, Because if it was Infinity Ward in there place, they would be shitting there selfs as well.

Of course no one makes a big deal about people playing Japanese and killing Americans in WWII multiplayer games, or playing Germans doing the same thing. And no one cares about being Russians in Modern Warfare games killing Americans either. Why? Because terrorists are scary brown people and it is currently in vogue for brown people to be scary.

Didnt MoH come out first? Oh wait...

someone already said that. I still had to say it though.

Not sure what my GOTY was, MineCraft? I know it came out in 2009, but Beta and Alpha came out in 2010.

Battlefield Bad Company 2

The controls were a bit sketchy, but it was definetly a better game than Modern Gayfare 2.

:\

~SN

Or, in other words, it SUCKS TOTAL ASS. CoD:BO is a masterpiece, even the single player, which is rare in CoD games. Medal of Honor is bad. It's just bad.

Hate to say it, but Black Ops multiplayer is crap. Its just so messed up, especially on ps3, and I think they overdid it when they tried to fix the issues from mw2. I lost all respect for Treyarch when they made this.

The matchmaking and the host system on PS3 makes it unplayable.

Single Player was nice, more interesting and understandable than MW2.

I wasn't really enticed by all the customization, or the balance "fixes".

~SN