Heark wrote:
Technically this is a pvp server though. No where does it say we actually can't go around killing people. i don't see how that is a bannable offense. (or worth a strike, whatever he was given for it)
Althought this might be a PvP server, theres rules about killing people inside the city. Therefore, murdering inside a city is quite stupid, expesally at Goldens watch.
And MrM12LRV, you said that Golden didnt like you wich indicated that you meant it was a personal decision. Golden is a good mod, and he would not let his personal opinion matter in a case like this. Im a friend of him, and i were almost banned cause i was readying my grief cannons to take down Cryston's bridge.
The other admins have been to sofy on you, and most people only get 1 more chance and not 2 like you did.. 4# time had to go..
Gatchet wrote:
Actually I wasn't aware that cities were able to create rules that allowed you to be banned if you killed someone inside their city. As far as I'm concerned, that is abuse of mod/admin power. The only consequences individual people or factions can/should be allowed to carry out as punishment for legal actions that transgress upon a individual/group are in-game, such as killing that person on sight, removing their lot from your city, etc.
Also, I brought up the fact that this is a pvp server because it was mentioned before that he had been given a strike/warning when he had killed people in vegas. My argument was that this should not be deserving of a strike or warning, therefore this being his 3rd, not 4th offense according to previous statements. Not until after my post was it clarified that he had been given warnings for 3 OTHER TRANSGRESSIONS besides the killing.
I didnt mean that he could be banned for it, but that he would be legaly killed by the city's soldiers/guards. He meant that it made a personal hatref/dislike from goldens side..