It has been some time any news?

hello?

Username: tsm200 (breuejelle@gmail.com) When you were banned : I don't know Person who banned you: i don't know Reason you were banned: i don't know Server: (Wildlands, PVP, Main, Tekkit, Creative): Main I haven't been online for a while and never did anything wrong as far as i know so can i please know why i was banned?

So in america there aren't any big dicks pocketing all the money in the government? And 2,095,006,005 people have acces to the internet, its 30% of the world population, that has to be enough to makea a chnge doesn't it? and if you look up the definition of common people you see that it doesn't mean global but usually all the people from 1 country. so if you look at the right country's the common people have all the power. And for this Part: For the common people to have power, ONE PERSON needs to become some kind of military dictator, use people and hurt them emotionally/verbally/physically as much as possible. He must absorb all the hate of the world. Before that, he must gather all the love of the oppressed, and lead them using strategy and tactics to defeat their oppressors and take the power of the countries. He'd then need to form a *new United Nations* bent on destroying all oppressors (with a vague definition of oppression) to give just cause for invading country after country. Eventually, he'd be in control of most of the world. Then, he'd start making changes to the world, changes that hurt everyone in some way. He'd gather the hate, as I stated, and eventually the people would rise up against him in a unified way. They'd destroy him (most likely kill him on the spot). They'd start a charter to unify all nations under peace. When one person absorbs all the hate, people are able to move forward. You may think this is childish, but look at human nature... this obeys all laws of human nature is is most likely to succeed if possible. This is the ONLY way to make change, and will result in the deaths of hundreds of millions of people on the planet. Would you rather have a corrupt world with only millions of people dying, or a peaceful world with the possibility of 1/3 of the world's population dying (nuclear war, as a world war is the only situation in which the non-proliferation treat would be broke). if what you are saying is true, then why don't we have a peaceful world now? looks like Hitler did that first part. And you're clearly still in the illusion that there has to be one leader, also nothing anyone is gonna say on this or any other forum and probably in real life is gonna change your view on these things so me posting this doesn't have anything to do with changing your mind this is for other people to see that if they search there facts all your points can be rebutted

this is at my school