dunsjohn wrote:
it was never formally stated that it would be allowed.
I believe that "cross-worlds inventory: yes", being stated on a page that introduces Minetown's different worlds, is "minetown formally stating" that corss-worlds inventory will be enabled.
And so, I believe that staff did make a mistake. A mistake that wasted a great deal of my time, as well as others who believed what Minetown told them.
You claim that "we should not believe everything we read". Yes, I agree. But do you not believe that information stated on a page that introduces Minetowns different worlds should be assumed to be true? Why would you rather put the information into the category that cannot be deemed to be reliable? Then we would not be able to rely on an extensive amount of information on Minetown. I find this to be ridiculous.
If our differences lie in sheer semantics, I have no problem ending the discussion here. But if you have any other issues, any comments are welcome.
And even if they announce it later on, the fact that they said cross-worlds inventory was going to be "enabled" instead "we dont know yet" is a mistake on their part.